
Photo Illustration by Ezinne Osueke / THE REPUBLIC. Source Ref: PEXELS.
THE MINISTRY OF GENDER X SEXUALITY
The Indigenous Queer Vision for a Decolonial West Africa

Photo Illustration by Ezinne Osueke / THE REPUBLIC. Source Ref: PEXELS.
THE MINISTRY OF GENDER X SEXUALITY
The Indigenous Queer Vision for a Decolonial West Africa
As the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) celebrates its 50 years anniversary, it is a momentous occasion to reflect on its achievements and challenges, especially on the lives of indigenous gender and sexual minorities living in West Africa. Founded in Lagos, Nigeria, by 15 out of 16 states in West Africa in May 1975, the birth of ECOWAS marked the beginning of what was considered a new era in economic cooperation and development in West Africa. Its founding treaty emphasized the importance of mobilizing particularly the young population of men and women living in West Africa for the development of its states.
Specifically, the Revised Article 63 of the ECOWAS treaty mandated that it focused on developing policies and programs to enhance the economic, social and cultural conditions and realities of women on the West African region. The recognition of the importance of promoting gender development to eradicate poverty has motivated ECOWAS to integrate gender considerations and critical concerns of women into its policies, programming and initiatives. Its Gender Development Centre, for instance, established in 2003, is a hub for mobilizing, advancing and empowering women across member states in West Africa. While this is commendable, its engagement with gender and sexual minorities in West Africa and the issues that affect them socially, economically and politically have notably been silent in its 50 years of existence. This silence reflects the state of the rights of gender and sexual minorities in many West African states, which have often justified discrimination against queer people and the LGBTI+ community by referencing ‘African culture’.
While this reflects a broader policy gap in the human rights framework of ECOWAS, it is also an even deeper reflection of how colonialism and neocolonial narratives continue to shape discourses on sexuality and identity in West Africa and across many African states, even decades after independence. It is an indication that ECOWAS’ intentional exclusion of indigenous gender and sexual (queer) minorities living in West Africa undermines its stated development goals. True decolonization of West Africa must start from a rejection of both colonial heteropatriarchy and post-colonial homophobia. The development of West Africa is forever dependent on its ability to mobilize all its human resources, including its diversity—of which gender and sexual minorities are an integral part.
COLONIALISM AND THE UNQUEERING OF WEST AFRICA
The argument that gender and sexual diversity is un-African has been weaponized by many states in West Africa to justify the exclusion of gender and sexual minorities from participating in political, social and economic life. Such discourses often frame queerness, non-heteronormativity and the demand for LGBTIQ+ inclusion by gender and sexual minorities as a western Euro-American imperialist imposition from the global North. This discourse, though popularized in southern Africa by Zimbabwe’s leader, Robert Mugabe, and echoed by political elites across West Africa, has been used to justify policies that marginalize gender and sexual minorities and rationalize social harm against them. Such rhetoric is completely ahistorical and stands as a distinct reminder of how colonial ideologies continue to permeate the very essence of what is considered West African culture.
First, this discourse assumes a coherent whole West Africa with a static culture fixed in a certain point in time. This assumption of a singular ‘African’ or West African identity is fiction. As thinkers like Cameroonian historian, Achille Mbembe, have pointed out, Africa is a geographic reality, not a cultural monolith. The continent’s 54 countries and over 3,000 ethnic communities have always held distinct beliefs and knowledge about gender, sexuality and community that transcends even western understanding and conception of queerness, identity and kinship. West Africa itself encompasses more than 1,000 distinct ethnic communities with different languages, practices and traditions—to assume all of these communities genuinely had no tolerance for gender diversity would be nothing short of ahistorical revisionism.
Historical evidence documents non-heteronormative societies of gender and sexually diverse groups existing across time and communities throughout Africa and specifically West Africa. In Nigeria, for instance, professor of anthropology, Rudolf Gaudio, details an ethnographic account of the Yan Daudu, a distinct non-heteronormative community of self-identified feminine men in northern Nigeria who predated the influence of both Christian and Islamic religions in the region, but are facing increasing politics, scrutiny and marginalization in contemporary times. While some of Yan Daudu engage in same-sex activities, this is not a defining criterion of their identity. The Yan Daudu should be understood not solely through the lens of contemporary LGBT+ identities but as a socio-occupational group with distinct roles in Hausa society predating the import of western religion and politics. They often worked in brothels and similar environments, serving as intermediaries between clients and sex workers, managing interactions with authorities, and recruiting individuals into sex work. Beyond this, they also engaged in tasks traditionally coded as ‘women’s work’ within Hausa contexts, such as preparing and selling food—particularly snacks like fried potatoes, eggs and chicken—which reinforced their integration into gendered economic structure.
Similarly, cultural anthropologist, Edwin Otu, and intercultural communications scholar, Godfried Asante, have documented other indigenous communities of feminine and female embodied men in Ghana and Côte d’Ivoire. The traditions of female embodied men in the Sassoi communities in southern Ghana, for instance, existed long before colonial encounters in West Africa. In the cosmology of Fantes in central and western Ghana, third genders or effeminate men and masculine women were considered to have souls changed at birth. For them, effeminate men had light souls while masculine women carried heavy souls and this category of third gender served an important part of traditional authority. Men of the Woodabe nomadic pastoral community, indigenous to West Africa and roaming across Niger, Nigeria, Chad, Cameroon, Burkina Faso and Ghana, have historically embraced beauty standards that emphasize what would be categorized as feminine aesthetics and crossdressing according to contemporary western politics and norms. Women marrying other women for several reasons including love, socioeconomic support and inheritance have also been documented across at least 30 groups in Africa, including among the Nankani, documented by philosopher Rosemary Amengo and among other indigenous same sex loving or knowing women living in southern Ghana, as documented by social anthropologist Serena Dankwa. Nigerian feminist anthropologist, Ifi Amadiume, and Yoruba literary scholar, George Olusola Ajibade, have also respectively documented both indigenous queer existence and colonial imposition of gender binaries among the Igbo and Yoruba living in Nigeria, Benin and Togo. Amadiume’s work in fact predates the institutionalization of queer theory, which began in the early 1990s, in western academy, demonstrating how West African scholars have long identified and pushed against the colonial ways we interpret gender in the sub-continent.
It is in fact approaching West Africa with a colonial gaze that flattens and erases its gender and sexual diversity. It is also this same gaze that attaches a rigid notion of ‘Africanness’ to the culture of many diverse communities in West Africa. When people today dismiss queerness as ‘unAfrican’, they are not defending tradition or culture, rather what they are doing is recycling colonial scripts through discourses meant to other and legitimize violence against gender and sexually diverse West Africans.
VICTORIAN ERA LAWS, BRITISH MORALITY, AND THE SPREAD OF HOMOPHOBIA
The Victorian era spanning 1837–1901 witnessed a rapid expansion of the British middle class which emerged as a dominant cultural force to gradually supplant the influence of the British aristocracy on society. Historian, Jamie Cantoni, describes this class as one that established itself with a distinct lifestyle which placed a heightened importance on the family unit and a private home. Men were breadwinners, and women’s roles were strictly confined to undertaking domestic responsibilities with limited legal rights. Also bolstered by a strong evangelical movement, the middle class championed a rigid code of respectability and morality. Christian morality was articulated by both the Church of England and the rising evangelical movement, becoming a deeply embedded part of British cultural society. Evangelicalism emphasized personal salvation, discipline and charity and promoted a strict puritanism which frosted a culture of guilt, self-discipline and abstinence from pleasure. This movement also inspired a wave of social reforms such as campaigns against slavery, child labour and religious social vices like smoking, alcoholism, gambling, prostitution, abortion and homosexuality.
In 1861, it manifested in the passage of the Offenses Against the Persons Act by the British as part of supposed British cultural values reformation which criminalized abortions, sex work and sodomy with at least ten years imprisonment. As British imperialism and influence extended across its colonies, these Victorian values-including their attitudes toward sexuality-were exported and enforced, perpetuating homophobia both within Britain and throughout its empire. In 1886, the British codified the criminalization of homosexual and same sex activity through Section 377 of India’s Penal code which stood in India for 70 years and was used to persecute and police Indian colonial subjects. Law professor and activist, Douglas Sanders, in ‘And the Unnatural Afterlife of British Colonialism in Asia’ has argued that the original intention of the introduction of Section 377 was to control, regulate and police Indians as Victorian era morality considered them sexually and erotically perverse.
Similarly, it introduced this bill across its colonies in West Africa including Ghana, Nigeria, Sierra Leone and Gambia who all continue to have these laws. Even further, most of them have proposed or already amended these laws into stricter versions which continue to harm and disenfranchise indigenous queer people. Nigeria passed its Same Sex Marriage Prohibition Act (SSMPA) in 2013 criminalizing homosexual relations with 14 years imprisonment. In Ghana, same-sex relations were rendered illegal under Section 23 of Ghana’s Criminal Offenses Act which was also inherited from the British. However, in February 2024, its parliament passed an even stricter anti-LGBTQ bill which, if signed into law by Ghana’s president, would increase penalties for same-sex activity and advocacy, with potential prison sentences and even extradition for both. Sierra Leone and Gambia also inherited this legislation from British colonial rule and continue to criminalize same sex relations with a life imprisonment.
Thus, the criminalization of queerness across many states in West Africa is a colonial legacy. By failing to recognize not only this historical fact but also the indigeneity of queer identities, ECOWAS and West African leaders have perpetuated a distorted view of African culture, and normalized violence and erasure of West African gender and sexually diverse communities.
shop the republic
NEOLIBERALISM AND LGBTQ IN CONTEMPORARY WEST AFRICA
The globalization of human rights framework after the Second World War and especially during the HIV epidemic in the United States significantly influenced gender and sexual diversity and its understanding in the global South and around the world. Interventions aimed to advance human rights were constructed efforts from Euro-American ways of knowing or understanding. Thus, the experiences of gay men in the global North were translated unto every same sex loving man in West Africa despite the difference in experiences and regardless of what these indigenous people called themselves. The HIV/AIDS sector and the academic community in the global North introduced the concept of LGBTIQ-representing same-sex-loving men and women, bisexuals, transgender, intersex and other nonheteronormative people within the global North.
While they offered important interventions aimed at advancing human rights and the health of gender and sexual minorities through global health advocacy, they have also been critiqued for sidestepping indigenous queerness and not always translating into the experiences of indigenous queer people or the politics that impact them. Programs meant to empower indigenous queer people in West Africa were often framed within these same western epistemologies which articulated LGBTIQ to categorize indigenous identities, sidelining indigenous terms that reflected more fluid or communal understandings of gender and sexuality.
WHO IS QUEER IN WEST AFRICA?
Who is queer in West Africa and who gets to define who is West African enough to be queer? I use the term ‘queer’ purposefully as a strategic reclamation that refers to our diverse indigenous expressions of gender and sexuality that resist colonial categorization. Unlike the rigid LGBTIQ+ framework that fragments our experiences into western labels, queerness here honours the fluidity and communal understanding of gender and sexuality that has always existed in West African cosmologies and social structures. ‘West Africa’, even before contact with Europe was a queer region. When we say we are queer, we simply re-echo the voices of ancestors who silently and/or openly resisted colonial-patriarchal heteronormativity and postcolonial homophobia.
Queer people from West Africa have been caught in a world where we are shoved into politics and labelled before we are able to label and identify ourselves. While western education labelled us as gays, lesbians, bisexuals, intersex and transgenders—for our different love, bodies and sexualities that did not fit within western categories—our indigenous names include Kojo Besia, Yan Daudu, Agyale, Supi and Sasso, and we were born and raised in Ghana, Nigeria, Burkina Faso and across West Africa. Some of us were born this way, some of us transitioned, some of us are men who are attracted to men, women who are attracted to women, to both men and women, or to none. Some of us have different bodies that did not align with the man and woman classifications at birth or later in life. We exist, we have always existed, and we have been integral parts of political, economic and spiritual authority in our societies throughout history.
For many of us who grew up in Ghana, Nigeria and other parts of West Africa, the terms gays, lesbians, transgenders and hermaphrodites did not only serve to mobilize for human rights or healthcare, but they were also often used to shame us socially. Gay, lesbian, intersex and transgenders are terms many queer people indigenous to West Africa have accepted and reclaimed after years of being shamed, to navigate a complex world shaped by heterosexuality and heteronormativity imposed upon us. To attribute our queerness to a western import is an attempt at not only further denying the sexual and gender diversity that has always existed in West Africa but also erasing and denying our very existence.
shop the republic
ECOWAS MOVE FROM NEUTRALITY TO CRIMINALIZATION IN POLICY
In recent times, ECOWAS has shifted their policy from silence on issues impacting gender and sexual minorities to playing a more active role in encouraging states to further suppress their rights and clamp down on sexual and gender minorities. I cite two key examples from important representatives of ECOWAS. In 2022, in the heat of Ghana’s anti-LGBT bill introduction and inflammation of discourses on gender and sexual minorities, Justice Edward Amoako Asante, the then president of the ECOWAS court of justice and now judge of the ECOWAS community court of justice in a worrying statement encouraged Ghana to pass its anti-LGBT bill since gender and sexual diversity was clearly against Ghana’s culture. Asante cited Nigeria and its SSMPA as a pioneer anti-LGBT regulation in West Africa.
The SSMPA has had such profound and devastating consequences on indigenous queer people and members of the LGBTIQ community in Nigeria. It has increased persecution, violence and systemic discrimination by criminalizing same-sex relationships, public displays of affection and organizing for LGBTIQ rights with penalties of up to 14 years. The law has also emboldened mob attacks, extortion, and vigilante violence against LGBTQ+ people. Queer Nigerians have been outed, beaten, or blackmailed by both police and civilians and perpetrators are rarely held accountable. Why a law like this is considered morally justified as a model for other West African states to copy is unfathomable.
In 2024, during an interactive session with ECOWAS commissioners on programmes implementation, the ECOWAS commissioner for human development and social affairs, Prof Fatou Sow Sarr, echoed similar comments referring to sexual orientation as a political manipulation of the West and suggesting that ECOWAS will categorically not include queer people in its programmes. Why exactly, you may ask, has ECOWAS adopted this shift from neutrality to open hostility towards gender and sexual minorities?
POST-COLONIAL HOMOPHOBIA AS A TOOL FOR CONSOLIDATING POWER
Many states in West Africa have held on tightly to anti-LGBT+ rhetorics and discourses after independence. These states have repurposed or enacted laws regulating the private lives of citizens through a contradictory rhetoric of Victorian era evangelical nationalism. African elites frame their opposition to LGBT+ rights as resistance to neo-colonialism, portraying themselves as defenders of African values against western imposition to consolidate power for the following reasons. First, to scapegoat and distract attention from governance failures and economic hardships through unifying populations against a common enemy, the homosexual. This has become a tool for amassing political power and distracting attention from failures of economic policies. West Africa, after all, is one of the poorest regions on the globe, with very high poverty rates. Many states in West Africa have a large percentage of their population living on less than $2 per day. States like Guinea, Nigeria, Niger, Ghana, Togo and Côte d’Ivoire continue to experience high unemployment and poverty.
This political tactic was notably employed and popularized by Zimbabwe’s former president, Robert Mugabe, who took it on himself to flood the news with western imposed homosexuals (white gay Rhodesian activists) who were a threat to Zimbabwe and African values during Zimbabwe’s economic recession post its coup. This strategy has been borrowed by many West African states such as Ghana where activists have criticised former president Nana Akuffo Addo’s mismanagement of the economy, under whose tenure Ghana’s anti-LGBTQ Bill was introduced.
Secondly, postcolonial political elites continue to adopt colonial-era heteronormative ideas despite contradictory historical evidence to maintain control through rigid gender roles and nuclear family structures. In ECOWAS Professor Sarr’s politicization of the existence of LGBTIQ people in West Africa, she insists that there are only two genders (man and woman) with strictly assigned societal roles. As African feminist scholar, Oyèròkè Oyéwumi, shows in her work on Yoruba society in Nigeria, the adoption and enforcement of Euro-American nuclear family structures where men serve as head of households while women lack political voice, dispossessed women of their original political, economic and social authority. Colonial imposition of gender roles officially positioned African men as heads of the home, restructuring inheritance and trade systems to favour male authority. The assigned roles Professor Sarr references effectively assign women to domesticity and silence and reinforces the same colonial bio-essential heterosexist beliefs West African decolonial feminists have long resisted.
Finally, these laws are further expanded to criminalize advocacy for not only LGBTQ+ rights but also to categorically silence free speech and dissent. States empowered to police and punish the private lives of citizens use this power as a tool to punish anyone they consider as a political opposition, often targeting civil society organizations who do important human rights work and shed light on government abuses. As observed in many states in Africa where authoritarian (or pseudo liberal) governments are quick to label critics of their neoliberal policies as supporting homosexuality, leaders desperate to hold on to power readily accuse opposition figures of being gay or supporting LGBTQ+ rights, deliberately conflating queerness with criminality.
shop the republic
-
‘Make the World Burn Again’ by Edel Rodriguez by Edel Rodriguez
₦70,000.00 – ₦75,000.00 This product has multiple variants. The options may be chosen on the product page -
‘Natural Synthesis’ Print by Diana Ejaita
₦70,000.00 – ₦75,000.00 This product has multiple variants. The options may be chosen on the product page -
‘Homecoming’ Print by Shalom Ojo
₦70,000.00 – ₦75,000.00 This product has multiple variants. The options may be chosen on the product page -
‘Kongi’s Harvest’ Print by Diana Ejaita.
₦70,000.00 – ₦75,000.00 This product has multiple variants. The options may be chosen on the product page
shop the republic
AT 50 YEARS, WHY IS AN INCLUSIVE WEST AFRICA STILL BEYOND REACH?
At 50 years, an inclusive West Africa that leaves no one behind should be the biggest priority of ECOWAS. While it has made important strides in promoting gender equality through initiatives such as its revised Article 63 of the ECOWAS Treaty and the ECOWAS Strategic Plan 2023-2027 for Gender Development aimed at addressing gender-based violence, enhancing women’s participation in governance, and promoting economic empowerment of women, these policies have excluded indigenous sexual and gender minorities, an approach that seemingly values women’s lives only to the extent that they are not queer. This exclusion has clearly not been justified yet ECOWAS has recently shifted into a policy of further politicizing the lives of gender and sexual minorities, a reflection of both the socioeconomic woes and instability that currently plagues West Africa.
It is imperative for ECOWAS and the entire West African region to understand that true decolonization must dismantle all forms of oppression including and especially heteropatriarchy and postcolonial homophobia that leaves people behind. Many postcolonial scholars and activists in West Africa, as highlighted in this essay, work to shed light on indigenous gender and sexual minorities, the politics they must navigate and the social barriers that legalized homophobia continue to erect against them. These works challenge both neocolonial interventions that frame queerness as exclusively western and local homophobic nationalism that continues to deny the existence of queerness.
ECOWAS must adopt policies that reconsider and expand its empowerment programs towards gender and sexual minorities living in West Africa. It must recognize and interact with grassroots organizations who advocate for the rights of queer people living in West Africa and explicitly revise its gender policies to recognize and support the intersectional needs of the LGBTIQ community. In celebrating its 50th anniversary, ECOWAS has an opportunity to redefine its vision for the future. A future where it supports gender and sexual minorities to get legal protections, cultural recognition, reparations and representation in political and economic life. A decolonized West Africa must be one where all individuals—regardless of their sexual orientation or gender identity—can live with dignity and freedom⎈
BUY THE MAGAZINE AND/OR THE COVER
-
‘Make the World Burn Again’ by Edel Rodriguez by Edel Rodriguez
₦70,000.00 – ₦75,000.00 This product has multiple variants. The options may be chosen on the product page -
The Republic V9, N2 Who Dey Fear Donald Trump? / Africa In The Era Of Multipolarity
₦20,000.00