The Charged Politics of an African Passport

Passport

Photo Illustration by Ezinne Osueke / THE REPUBLIC. Source Ref: Adenike Ebunoluwa Oyagbola / EDUGIST.

THE MINISTRY OF WORLD AFFAIRS

The Charged Politics of an African Passport

Africans remain constrained within and outside the continent due to their passports, which have hindered the exploration of global opportunities.
Passport

Photo Illustration by Ezinne Osueke / THE REPUBLIC. Source Ref: Adenike Ebunoluwa Oyagbola / EDUGIST.

THE MINISTRY OF WORLD AFFAIRS

The Charged Politics of an African Passport

Africans remain constrained within and outside the continent due to their passports, which have hindered the exploration of global opportunities.

As globalization expands, with international cooperation, businesses, contracts and education becoming more popular and intertwined, countries seek to open their doors to foreign talent and the concept of visa-free travel has become a new form of diplomatic currency. Many Asian nations have already leveraged their economic strength and political stability to negotiate visa-free or visa-on-arrival access for their citizens across various countries. China, Japan and South Korea have enhanced multilateral relations via reciprocated visa-free policies, which promotes trade, tourism and investments among these countries. In 2022, South Korea’s investment in China was $6.6 billion, an increase of $2.6 billion compared to 2021. Likewise, China’s visa-free accords with Thailand on 28 January 2024 and Malaysia on 30 November 2024 have enhanced regional commerce, investment and diplomatic collaboration within the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN). This privilege is not just a testament to their economic influence but is also the result of years of good diplomatic relations. 

THE FAILED POTENTIAL OF THE AU PASSPORT

According to an African Union Report in July 2016, African leaders met for the official launch of the African Union (AU) passport during the 27th African Union Summit in Kigali, Rwanda. This event was expected to open the doors to free movement to work, unleash economic growth and increase the intra-African trade. These ideas were echoed by Rwanda’s foreign affairs minister, Louise Mushikiwabo, who said that there were high expectations about the AU Passport, since the plan was aimed at creating an atmosphere that would ‘dissolve all barriers to mobility’ as well as foster trade between African countries. This was seen beyond the launch of the African Continental Free Trade Area as a significant jump towards Africa’s historical vision of regional integration and the eventual removal of non-tariff barriers that have been spurring the continent’s fragmentation for quite a long time. With the issuance of this new passport, Africa was expecting to achieve the freedom of movement of people, goods and services, which was agreed in major policy frameworks and strategies such as Lagos Plan of Action (1980) and Abuja Treaty (1991). 

However, eight years later, the dream of the African Union passport remains unfulfilled. The excitement from Kigali has not been matched by swift implementation, raising questions about the achievability of the vision. In May 2024, at the Africa CEO Forum in Kigali, Aliko Dangote, Africa’s wealthiest man, spoke about the difficulties he faces while traveling within the continent. Despite being a renowned entrepreneur with business interests across multiple African countries, Dangote confessed that navigating the visa requirements of different countries on the continent is a huge challenge. He explained to the audience that, unlike travellers with European passports, he has to go through the tedious process of applying for visas in almost every African country he visits. ‘As an investor, as somebody who really wants to make Africa great, I have to apply [for] 35 different visas on my passport,’ he said. Dangote added that the process was not only time-consuming but also impractical for someone with his schedule: ‘I really don’t have the time to go and be dropping my passport in embassies to get a visa.’ Turning to Patrick Pouyanne, the CEO of Total Energies, who was seated beside him, Dangote made a striking comparison: ‘I can assure you Patrick doesn’t need 35 visas on a French passport, which means you have freer movement than myself in Africa.’ Dangote’s comment underscored the irony that European nationals, from former colonial countries, have more freedom of movement in Africa than many Africans themselves. 

In March 2025, Alma Asinobi, a Nigerian travel content creator, who tried to break the Guinness World Record for the quickest time to visit all the continents of the world faced a lot of hurdles despite proper planning. And the biggest of these challenges was presented by her Nigerian passport, which hindered her from beating the record of 64 hours set by American veteran Johnny Cruz Buckingham in February 2025. Asinobi had to deal with delays and extra scrutiny at different airports during her journey. Such experience shows the systemic obstacles many African and Nigerian travellers often face, even when their documentation is in order. Even though Asinobi did not break the record, her voyage sparked important conversations about passport privilege and the challenges faced by travellers from countries with limited visa-free access. However, while some nations like Rwanda, Ghana and Mauritius have made strides in easing visa restrictions, the broader African states remain fragmented, with citizens still facing daunting travel restrictions within their own continent. 

Since the formation of the AU in 2002, several instances of poor diplomatic relations have persisted among African nations, often resulting from historical grievances, territorial disputes, political disagreements and economic competition. One notable example is the long-standing tension between Morocco and Algeria over the issue of Western Sahara. In 1984, Morocco withdrew from the Organization of African Unity (OAU), the AU’s predecessor, after the organization admitted the Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic. Morocco claims sovereignty over the Western Sahara, while Algeria supports the Polisario Front, a movement fighting for the region’s independence. The conflict has not ceased in causing tension between the two North African nations, even after Morocco’s re-integration into the Maputo-based bloc in 2017. Such political tensions affect cooperation within the region and limit experimentations such as visa liberalization or the freedom of movement within the continent. An example is how Algerian authorities to this day regulate the access of Moroccan people and vice versa, even though the two nations have similar cultures and histories. 

Another case of diplomatic imbalance in Africa occurred between Rwanda and Uganda in 2019, when Rwanda closed its borders to Uganda, citing Uganda’s support for rebel groups hostile to the Rwandan government. Uganda, in turn, accused Rwanda of espionage. The dispute badly disrupted trade and regional security within the East African Community (EAC). The prolonged border closure also directly affected ordinary citizens, hindering the free movement of people and goods as visa policies between the two countries became stricter. While the AU and regional bodies mediated the dispute, the distrust lingers and full normalization of relations remains a work in progress. Also, the rift and split between Sudan and South Sudan in 2011 has led to continuous diplomatic and military tensions, especially over the oil-rich border regions of Abyei and Heglig. The poor diplomatic relationship between Sudan and South Sudan has also affected visa regimes, as both nations often impose strict travel requirements on each other’s citizens. The unstable nature of the region, fuelled by ongoing conflicts, discourages international partners from offering more relaxed visa regulations for Sudanese and South Sudanese citizens, limiting mobility to other parts of Africa and beyond. 

It is impossible to talk of diplomatic strain and leave out the Kenya–Somalia maritime territorial disagreement. It boiled over in 2009 when the two nations claimed sovereignty over an area in the Indian Ocean of about 100,000 square kilometres, which experts hypothesize to contain oil and natural gas. In 2021, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) decided on the case in favour of Somalia, but Kenya rejected the decision, which deepened tensions. Besides the political crises that the two nations have been experiencing, this diplomatic feud has also impaired movement between the two countries. A very recent diplomatic fallout occurred between Côte d’Ivoire and Mali in 2022 when 49 soldiers from Côte d’Ivoire were held in Mali on the grounds of being mercenaries planning to overthrow Mali’s government. Côte d’Ivoire defended the actions of the soldiers as being in fulfilment of their duties as members of the United Nations peacekeeping force in the region, but this event brought the diplomatic relationship between the two West African nations to an end, leading to implementations of restrictive and stringent travel policy measures between the two countries. 

shop the republic

shop the republic

THE ECOWAS PASSPORT

In 2000, the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) established its regional passport to facilitate free movement of people and commodities among its 15-member states, following the 1979 ECOWAS Protocol on Free Movement of Persons, Residence and Establishment. ECOWAS citizens could travel, reside and work between member countries without a visa, making the passport a big step towards regional collaboration. The holder’s status and travel purpose determine the passport’s type: regular, service or diplomatic. Based on accord, citizens of ECOWAS countries, including Nigeria, Ghana, Senegal and others can travel visa-free, improving mobility for millions. Intra-regional movement has grown since the passport was introduced. As of 2020, according to the International Organization for Migration, around 21 million ECOWAS people lived in other ECOWAS countries. This figure represents three per cent of the ECOWAS population and shows how the passport improved cross-border mobility. 

However, even though the ECOWAS passport has facilitated travel for many, its success has been inconsistent. Political instability and security concerns have caused certain member states to temporarily restrict free movement. After the wave of Sahel terrorist attacks and jihadist activity in Mali and Burkina Faso, regional governments have increased border procedures, weakening seamless mobility. And despite the ECOWAS accord, Nigeria temporarily blocked its land borders to prevent smuggling in 2019, impacting trade and migration from Benin Republic and Niger. The ECOWAS passport’s visa security effects vary. While the passport streamlines regional travel, it has not fixed migration, security or trust issues between some member states. 

COLONIAL INFLUENCE & THE MISREPRESENTATION OF AFRICAN STATES

It would be a sheer oversimplification to attribute the inability of African countries to secure visa-free access for their citizens entirely to poor diplomatic relations. Diplomatic relations among African countries have been highly influenced by external hegemonic colonial power and media representation, which both interplay in complex ways. In the text, On the Postcolony, Achille Mbembe, a Cameroonian historian and political theorist, argues that African countries’ relationships with one another in the postcolonial era have been strained by legacies of colonial exploitation, inequality and uneven development. Many African countries were left with economies dependent on their former colonial rulers and have struggled to exert diplomatic influence, not just in global arenas like the UN, World Trade Organization and International Monetary Fund, but also among other African diplomatic relations. In these arenas, African countries often find themselves with limited bargaining power in terms of diplomatic relations, particularly in securing favourable terms of international agreements, including visa-free travel within the African continents. 

In terms of media representation, some sort of singular narrative projection that surrounds Africa often emphasizes instability and conflict. For example, the coverage of the Nigerian Boko Haram insurgency has perpetuated negative stereotypes about Nigeria, impacting the perceptions of other African nationals and the ability of Nigerians to secure visas. In 2019, the United States made it difficult for Nigerians to get US visas due to security worries related to Boko Haram. Following suit, South Africa also imposed stricter visa rules on Nigerians, influenced by negative media representations. Films such as Blood Diamond and documentaries like The Truth About Africa are some examples of media that often represent African countries in a negative light, which can influence visa policies by shaping public opinion and fostering fear of migration. 

Henley & Partners’ 2023 Passport Index, which ranks countries based on the number of destinations their citizens can access without a prior visa, places many African countries towards the bottom of the list. Nigeria ranks 97th with visa-free or visa-on-arrival access to only 45 destinations, while countries in Europe, North America and East Asia dominate the top of the list with access to over 180 destinations. This disparity is evident not just in poor diplomatic relations but also in broader global inequalities involving power and influence. The report correlates travel restrictions with economic indicators. Countries with stronger economies tend to have fewer visa restrictions placed on their citizens. For instance, German passport holders have access to 190 countries without a visa, largely due to their country’s strong economy and international relations.  

shop the republic

shop the republic

POROUS BORDERS AND SECURITY THREATS

The promise of visa-free travel is enshrined in the AU’s Agenda 2063, which envisions greater integration, free movement of people and economic collaboration. However, such policies, while beneficial for economic and social integration, do not holistically look into the area of cross-border security. Visa-free policies among African states have the potential to inadvertently facilitate an increased movement of criminal elements across borders if control and intelligence sharing mechanisms are not put in place. Africa has had a history of cross-border insurgencies and criminal networks. The Sahel region, for instance, is notorious for the presence of terrorist groups like Boko Haram, Al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb and the Islamic State in West Africa, who exploit the porous borders between countries like Nigeria, Niger, Mali and Chad. According to a report by Crisis Group in 2019, the uncontrolled movement of people and goods in this region has enabled the proliferation of weapons and drugs, complicating efforts by states to maintain security. 

Similarly, the East African Community (EAC) agreement of 2010 made trade across borders in East Africa easier. However, this also brought about security problems, such as path expansion for smugglers. A 2016 intelligence report from the Institute for Security Studies (ISS) says that the policy made it easier for illegal drugs and weapons to move between Kenya and Somalia. Al-Shabaab terrorist organization based in Somalia offers an actual threat to security. The ISS argued that while open borders are a welcome development, they come with the risk of raising the incidence of extremism, as members are likely to escape surveillance than other individuals. 

On the other hand, some scholars have pointed out that visa-free travel should be established alongside robust biometric data and efficient surveillance mechanisms in order to offer a better security proposition. Professor Mbembe argued that the politically correct, well-managed, visa-free regime can increase cooperation between African states and the sharing of information; consequently, criminal networks will struggle to thrive. An open visa policy must be closely followed by a sound security architecture. For instance, the development of an African Border Security Network that includes individual border agencies and organizations and would be faced with the challenge of processing real-time or near real-time information about the various threats and individuals will be very useful in addressing some of these risks. The United Nations Development Programme has similarly supported the use of auto-identification systems, which, if adopted, could guarantee identifiable persons moving from one African country to the other and thus limiting the possibility of cross border criminality. 

shop the republic

shop the republic

IMPLICATIONS OF CBI ON AFRICAN REGIONS

There is an increasing demand for Caribbean passports, especially among affluent and middle-income earners in Africa. This has been mainly occasioned by citizenship by investment (CBI). For the African region, it has several implications that are beneficial in some ways, adverse in others. St. Kitts and Nevis, Dominica, and Grenada require candidates to make significant financial investments in order to obtain Caribbean citizenship. However, this phenomenon has implications on the socio-political, economic and security situation of the continent of Africa. The first of these is that it has enhanced the mobility of African citizens in general who are customarily locked out of the West by restrictive visa regimes. For example, citizens of St. Kitts and Nevis or Grenada pass through at least 141 countries without a visa or get a visa on arrival to the EU and the United Kingdom. 

A 2020 World Bank report revealed that three out of four Africans suffer high visa rejection rates to Schengen countries, a major reason behind Caribbean passports’ popularity. With a Caribbean passport, Africans are able to access quality education, better healthcare and freely conduct businesses. Nevertheless, this attraction has some economic downsides that may affect the African region. African economies lose out through investments made in Caribbean countries by would-be investors seeking Caribbean citizenship. A 2021 report by Henley & Partners revealed that Africans are the increasing share of CBI applicants and Nigerians and South Africans are among the select applicants in the recent period. Such an outward financial flow is symptomatic of a portfolio shift otherwise known as capital flight, which is detrimental to internal investment and growth. For instance, Nigeria, in 2020, recorded a capital flight loss of more than $4.5 billion in political and economic risks, which has been driven by the prosperity of international citizenship sales. CBI can also deepen economic inequality where the wealthy few invest in overseas assets while the majority struggle at home. 

Another downside to the Caribbean passport is that African political elites are able to escape the countries they failed to develop. For example, in Zimbabwe, economic collapse and political repression have driven elites to seek alternative citizenship, showing that the ruling class is not fully invested in the long-term welfare of the nation. A 2020 Transparency International report highlights how alternative citizenship acquisition can serve as a safety net for politicians and businessmen seeking to shield themselves from political turmoil, thereby reducing their incentive to push for democratic reforms or fight corruption at home. 

In contrast, some scholars posit that several potentials of mobility and global networks attached to Caribbean citizenship are soluble in the African region as well. For example, African businessmen and managers possessing Caribbean licenses to travel can take their businesses to other countries, thereby increasing income flows into the African nations. A 2020 African Development Bank report showed that diaspora remittance to Africa was noted at $48 billion, pointing to the likelihood of enhanced business relations between the diaspora and Africa. 

However, the shift in this area of study cannot be regarded as exempt from security risks. CBI has been criticized, especially by Caribbean nations, over the laxity of scrutinization of investors as sceptics and critics fear that the scheme is suitable for con artists. The investigative journalist agency Global Witness, in a report released in July 2019, said that several CBI programmes, including Caribbean ones, naturalized people involved in financial offenses such as money laundering and tax evasion. CBI could expose Caribbean nations to extra-legal processes in its endeavour to prosecute criminals or officials who have fled to the Caribbean after indulging in unlawful activities by acquiring Caribbean passports. 

UNDERSTANDING THE VARIATION IN AFRICAN PASSPORT STRENGTH

Passport strength, which is defined based on the number of countries a bearer can enter visa-free or for a visa on arrival, correlates with a country’s power. Political stability, record economic performance, diplomacy and previous connections indeed influence the perception of a country’s political viability, thus determining the ease with which its citizens can travel abroad and be accepted. The economic capability of individual nation-states is one of the causes for the observed differences in the strengths of African passports. For example, relatively richer nation-states like Seychelles and Mauritius boast of stronger passports because they are considered low-risk in terms of instances of overstay or evasion of immigration laws. The latest ranking by the Henley Passport Index (2023) revealed that Seychelles takes the position as the most powerful African passport, which grants visa-free or visa-on-arrival entry to 153 countries. This strength is a result of its fairly stable economy, and it maintains steady diplomatic relations in interstate partnering. 

On the other hand, Nigeria’s passport is among the weakest on the African continent, with 46 countries granting visa-free or visa-on-arrival entry as of 2023. This can be blamed more on the instability of Nigerian politics, economic outlook and insecurity. For instance, the increasing cases of kidnapping and banditry have put Nigeria in a bad light internationally. The security concerns are exacerbated by the fact that Nigeria has been notorious for corrupt practices, which have brought about social and economic insecurities to its governance and police force. Nigeria is ranked near the bottom of the passport index not only due to internal conflict but also the perception of migration dangers. In the United Nations decade report on population, emigration rate by country of origin for 2022 by the Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Nigeria was found to be among the top African countries with high rates of emigrants in foreign countries due to better economic conditions. Such a pattern of migration combined with instances where individuals stay beyond their legal visa period or participate in unlawful activities have resulted in stringent visa regimes by countries apprehensive of a Nigerian migration inflow. 

African nations have a long way to go in terms of securing the good standing their citizens deserve. Visa-free access has the potential to open doors for economic and educational opportunities, reduce the cost of travel and enhance Africa’s global presence. If African governments can focus on building stronger diplomatic ties and improving their internal governance, the power of an African passport might one day become a symbol of pride rather than a hindrance. The strength of a passport can make or break opportunities in our globalized world, and until African leaders prioritize this issue, many African citizens will continue to look elsewhere for the freedom and access they deserve

BUY THE MAGAZINE AND/OR THE COVER