Photo illustration by Dami Mojid / THE REPUBLIC.
THE MINISTRY OF GENDER X SEXUALITY
Reimagining Sacrifice Through an African Feminist Diaspora
Photo illustration by Dami Mojid / THE REPUBLIC.
THE MINISTRY OF GENDER X SEXUALITY
Reimagining Sacrifice Through an African Feminist Diaspora
The readily available images of a matriarch who forgoes her personal passions and stays at home to take care of the family echo the silence of the inner world of many women. The sacrifice of women is often encoded as caretaking without being recognized as underpaid or unpaid labour. In my own lived experience, tracing the sacrifice of my ancestors in Nigeria to interpret my current experience born and living in diaspora, I question just how much the reliance on women’s labour essentializes sacrifice, and to what extent the spatial configuration of my access to feminism prompts me towards deconstructing how we understand sacrifice.
Perhaps the most apt place to begin to describe the feminisms engaged by Black, Caribbean, and Indigenous women around the world is to describe the home I grew up in: where my grandmothers were revered, my hands were actioned and my spirit contested. In the spring my mother would garden. I grew out of the phase for a few years but the yearning to smell lilacs in the garden a few years ago brought me back. In the summer, we would play outside all day, bathe, and then use baby powder for a cool night’s rest. Sleeping, in the fall, the recited memory verses entered our dreaming—still waters and cups overflowed. And in the winter, we woke up on Sunday mornings, greased faces, hair and tulle-d socks to cleanse our sins.
I did not realize until now, that space we created. I felt a passive participant in my role to follow rules. I stretched it out for sure. Banged up against the contradictions and tired of the lint on my use, I often thought ‘my grandmother’s sacrifice was not for me to play with.’ Growing up, I learn that I am a product of grandmothers who would do anything for their children. Framed dutifully, their lives were recounted through the sacrifices they made for their children (my parents) to be who and where they are now. Honouring the past put my future in rigid perspective. This ancestral veneration reminded me constantly that my access to choice is directly correlated to their lack thereof. Due to their physical distance away from me, their sacrifice felt so far removed and yet the pressure of upholding their legacy made it feel equally close.
Holding on to their memory, I am learning of what we share. That I too face the (albeit wildly different) dilemma of what to ‘give up’. The thing about sacrifice is that it exists in a particular time and place, making it unique to the one whom sacrifices and yet can layer time and place upon one another—united in a shared universal experience of loss. It is in this convergence of contradictions that I reanimate my grandmother’s sacrifice, choosing not to essentialize it as valourized ‘womanly behaviour’. Instead to find a shared experience to create a conjuncture of time and place that affirms their agency.
My reanimation is shaped by my access to the dissemination of feminist theory in Western media and post-secondary education. Living in ‘Canada’, I am in direct relationship to the ongoing legacies of imperialism and colonialism. As it were, I am also in the midst of resources that previous generations may not have had access to. I am not in favour of martyrdom, of believing one must commit a slow death through overworking, of sacrificing oneself. That belief, however, is both a unique awareness and special privilege I experience because I live in ‘Canada’, a place still benefiting from imperialism and maintaining violent colonial structures. I have learned about the atrocities this place has planned and executed to kill, erase, and remove indigenous populations for ‘Canada’ to exist as a political entity. I live in a place that expands my conception of what sacrifice is, what impossible conditions are, and what it means to daily consider these contradictions. How does this transform the memory of my grandmother’s sacrifice? It opens up space for contemplation about the meaning of diaspora and what solidarity can be formed through transnational feminism. It repositions my understanding of African feminisms as an ongoing legacy that is different but not severed from my experience in diaspora.
But across ethnicities, in conversations with my friends, on screen, in culture, the sacrifice that undergirds ‘womanhood’ has been transformed and actioned upon in feminist movements. If I am to view the continuity of African feminisms in its movement across the world, see its engagement by Caribbean, Indigenous and Black feminists, I can use my positionality (even if I must stretch and pull contradictions to do so) to understand sacrifice without prescribing it as gendered labour.
shop the republic
SOMETHING OUT OF ‘NOTHING’
Starting from where I am, I refuse linearity of time. I am (not) born in one place, descending from another. I am an amalgamation of all that came before which allows me to be and even restricts me from who I am today. Talk of our grandmother’s prayers, I find that Black American feminists have undergone the task of reconsidering history, finding ancestral knowledge in the interstices of archives.
The 2019 book titled Wayward Lives, Beautiful Experiments: Intimate Histories of Riotous Black Girls, Troublesome Women, and Queer Radicals written by Sadiya Hartman, a feminist scholar of African-American literature and history, shows us something crucial: sacrifice and refusal are not opposites but intimately connected. The book is about Black women, girls and people living in America in the early twentieth century, born after emancipation. Using archival documents and photographs, Hartman describes their ‘aim to make an art of subsistence.’ It is not the content of the book alone but Hartman’s commitment to the reanimation of their lives that displays art created by the radical transformation of oppressive circumstances through refusal.
We see this resonating across other forms of cultural work. In Randi Gill-Sadler and Erica R. Edwards article, ‘Taking Over, Living In: Black Feminist Geometry and the Radical Politics of Repair,’ filmmaker, writer, and cultural worker Toni Cade Bambara’s speculative filmmaking practice is considered as a politics of repair. Bambara’s film treatments were not produced, yet still ‘visualized what might happen when those who are normally seen as objects of state repair establish and enact improper and incomplete remedies to state violence.’ The feminist scholars Gill-Sadler and Edwards use ‘feminist scholarship’s capacity to effectively theorize and resist state violence’ as a guide to reconsider Bambara’s work in the article. Each of these thinkers share a radical history by reimagining the taken-for-granted sacrifice from the outside as political, and as a strategic refusal from within.
I admit that the messy contradiction between structure and agency can be simplified in modern considerations of history. It is present here in my own thinking about sacrifice. But this intentional attempt and willingness to reconsider how we remember collective sacrifices transforms history. Reconsidering contradictions of ‘history’, a past far removed from the present yet felt anxiously close, in the repetitions of harm where things have not changed, turns history into something we can build from.
What if the intimate connection between gendered labour is tied to culture because cultural products prioritize the memory of sacrifice? Forget nostalgia, I am talking about something more dynamic. The effort to create something new happens in the infinite combinations between repetition and rupture, between what we inherit and what we transform.
The structures that socialize gendered sacrifice are exactly what feminism pushes up against. But not in pursuit of individualism, rather, in an effort to make collective care a revered structure instead of expected martyrdom. Culture allows memory to exist on many levels, which means the work feminism does is both seen and unseen, both celebrated and overlooked.
Take the legacy of Trinidadian activist Claudia Jones, whose migration and exile materialized ‘elsewhere [into] creative space’ when she organized the London Carnival, which became the Notting Hill Carnival. But Jones’ legacy is not just her own work. It is also how feminist scholar Carol Boyce-Davies reconsidered and resurrected Jones as a cultural worker, and political figure. This kind of remembering attunes to the feelings of memory, prioritizes them, and soothes our fears of being forgotten. The transformation of circumstance becomes both a political orientation and a spiritual one.
shop the republic
FEELING AT HOME IN EXILE
This feeling reverberates in other areas of my life. Being a traveller, in motion and thus, in contention with history, me and my peers find ourselves at an impasse of extreme familiarity with historical conditions that can proscribe our freedom. Speaking from the contention between white male scholarship and Canadian First Nations women in academia, scholar of Indigenous feminism Dian Million, in ‘Felt Theory: An Indigenous Feminist Approach to Affect and History’, emphasizes the need for Native women to remember their feelings and experiences as community knowledges. When I consider what constitutes a connection to Africa for African descended people living in the Caribbeans, Europe and the Americas, I think about how Indigenous people in the Americas feel exile in their own home. For those living in the experience of exile, carving a space out of foreign land is not easy. Knowing the histories of dispossession that have been sustained from ‘Western science’s own wet dream of detached corporeality,’ Dian Million says, ‘carving’ out a space may not even be desirable for a liberated world we dream of.
Feelings construct worlds that we inhabit. So, what happens when it is disorienting to inhabit a space you may not be used to or when you are made a foreigner in your own home, in your own body? In a 2018 interview, Hartman points to the unique experience of dislocation and exile. Feeling something ‘difficult and exciting about being in a place that you don’t know’ is in direct opposition to the stoicism many women or gender nonconforming people personify when faced with the impasse of sacrifice. As the need to carry on and persist frames the expansion of culture, I do not believe stoicism is feminism’s promise to us. Instead, I suggest a return to sensory disorientation, to look at things differently.
Putting Hartman and Million in conversation with one another hears the distinctiveness of their voice made of similarities and differences. A ‘bright alert face and piercing eyes that announced her interest in the world,’ Hartman re-situates the history of Black women, usually over-defined in submission to anything else. It becomes clear that Million’s felt theory can be likened to the legacy of African feminisms, when we are charged to remember the ‘conditions under which these women spoke at all’ as eerily similar to what we inhabit in today’s arrangement of countries, and in the histories of violence perpetuated in ‘colonialism’s nastiest “domestic” secrets’.
As African feminist scholar Njoki Wane notes, the ‘cultural resource base and local knowledge of African people’ continues on throughout the diaspora in spatially resonant ways and in the environment one finds themself in. The similarities between African Indigenous Feminisms and First Nations Feminisms are also the differences stabilized by place. Culture, mediated by relationality to place, is also where the movement of refusal, riot and rebellion can be read from what is statically represented as sacrifice. Just as Million recalls the memories of Native women who have experienced violence from colonial dispossession, so too do ‘many African feminists (break) the silence imposed during colonialism and neo-colonialism to speak of their struggles and their realities and tell the truth not spoken about before.’ Globally, feminism orients a community to refuse the ongoing, raised or trained sacrifice of the lives of Black women and femmes across the diaspora as a taken-for-granted assumption.
The way I see it, the future directions of African feminisms are in the present action of sustaining a global community. Wane has been connecting the experiences of African Canadian women to the experience of Black Canadian women in order to move towards a holistic and definitive articulation and understanding of Black Canadian feminism. I depart from the search for definition and locate my own commitment to future directions of African feminisms in the existence of a diaspora, requiring consistency not to latch on to cheap, easy, commodified radicalism.
shop the republic
-
‘The Empire Hacks Back’ by Olalekan Jeyifous by Olalekan Jeyifous
₦70,000.00 – ₦75,000.00Price range: ₦70,000.00 through ₦75,000.00 This product has multiple variants. The options may be chosen on the product page -
‘Make the World Burn Again’ by Edel Rodriguez by Edel Rodriguez
₦70,000.00 – ₦75,000.00Price range: ₦70,000.00 through ₦75,000.00 This product has multiple variants. The options may be chosen on the product page -
‘Nigerian Theatre’ Print by Shalom Ojo
₦150,000.00 -
‘Natural Synthesis’ Print by Diana Ejaita
₦70,000.00 – ₦75,000.00Price range: ₦70,000.00 through ₦75,000.00 This product has multiple variants. The options may be chosen on the product page
shop the republic
MAKING HOME
Women therefore have been socialized not to call themselves people in their own homes but as property of the owner of the home–I cannot honestly speak to the root of this practice–however, my assumption is saying partly colonialism and partly some cultural practices.
—Njoki Wane
In an essay about the audience of African-Caribbean-Canadian writers, poet and novelist M. NourbeSe Philip reckons with what it is to engage with Abiswa, the personification of ancestral memory and wisdom, as a writer living in exile due to colonial processes. Remembering Abiswa, her demand to trust the body, which together with the mind, forms one intelligent representative of a certain collective race memory of the African. This tradition is often discouraged under colonial education and even more, stewarding this collective memory in culture results in the (broadly defined) gendered division of labour. Not only for those who keep Abiswa’s memory alive but the reliance on Abiswa herself by those who rely on her memory. The dependence on her voice and her story can become extractive if used to legitimate state practices of violence represented as care.
The history of violence on Indigenous peoples by the ‘Canadian’ state is seemingly in a process of Truth and Reconciliation, yet many failures exist in appropriately recognizing the legacy of such violence in the current or creating systems to prevent future harm. At the same time, histories of anti-Blackness are being addressed as Black federal workers engage in a lawsuit against the government while they celebrate the seeming inclusion of Black people in a ‘multicultural society’. Therefore, to be critical of the increased dependence on Abiswa articulated in relation to the growing ‘audiences for newer genres…subversion of the old order…seeking her wisdom and vitality,’ Philip says, the more exposed, yet, obscured the limits of state care through inclusion become. In ‘Canada’ as a diasporic identity is included in forms of liberal multiculturalism, gendered labour is under and unpaid in this violent process. Connecting African, Indigenous and Caribbean feminisms understands a diasporic feminism, and helps to decipher how state violence masquerades as inclusion.
I had written previously on developing home as a political strategy:
I wanted to think of home metaphorically. Leaning into the possibilities this device would give me to think about constructing sites of liberation. Using the body as a scale similar to that of a home, I thought about the role of radio in our homes. When our minds are imagined as a place between our ears filling our synapses with electric current creates an opportunity for changing the lighting in our head (houses), allows us to develop political stratagems through our longing of resting feet or greeting a family member. My assertion compels us to let life seep through the cartographic map and re-read it with song. For example, bridge: construction from chorus to verse on our way home to a future.
I wonder how to create such a home with respect for the sacrifice without repeating or glorifying the same circumstance that structured repression and loss. Like the family photos on the wall, what this attention to non-repetition provides is the refusal to obscure the re-enactment of a gendered division of labour over time. Looking at these sacrifices we exist within, in a different way, being disoriented in a new place and yearning for the otherwise, I see that home can be created in how one’s personal context provides knowledge to strengthen the link between our global cultural, political and social situations⎈
BUY THE MAGAZINE AND/OR THE COVER
-
‘Make the World Burn Again’ by Edel Rodriguez by Edel Rodriguez
₦70,000.00 – ₦75,000.00Price range: ₦70,000.00 through ₦75,000.00 This product has multiple variants. The options may be chosen on the product page -
The Republic V9, N2 Who Dey Fear Donald Trump? / Africa In The Era Of Multipolarity
₦40,000.00














