#EndSARS

Photo illustration by Michael Emono / THE REPUBLIC. 

THE MINISTRY OF GENDER X SEXUALITY

The Afterlives of #EndSARS

Member of the Feminist Coalition and organizer of the #ArewaMeToo and #NorthNormal movements, Fakhrriyyah Hashim, reflects on #EndSARS five years after ‘Feminists against SARS’ redefined national consciousness on police violence.
#EndSARS

Photo illustration by Michael Emono / THE REPUBLIC. 

THE MINISTRY OF GENDER X SEXUALITY

The Afterlives of #EndSARS

Member of the Feminist Coalition and organizer of the #ArewaMeToo and #NorthNormal movements, Fakhrriyyah Hashim, reflects on #EndSARS five years after ‘Feminists against SARS’ redefined national consciousness on police violence.

Five years ago, young Nigerians created a movement that was many things all at once. For two weeks in October 2020, #EndSARS was a mass offline movement across several states in Nigeria, as young Nigerians across ethnic, class and religious lines organized with hopes that their future could be different. It was digital activism that can be traced as far back as 2017, using Twitter for mass coordination and awareness. It was feminist organizing, with the Feminist Coalition emerging to not just counter the overrepresentation of men’s experiences of police violence and silencing of women, but also to speak for women, who often bear the harshest brunt of social movements. It was a queer statement, as #QueerNigerianLivesMatter insisted that a movement against police violence that normalizes violence against queer lives was counterproductive. It was class solidarity, as upwardly mobile people and less mobile people recognized their shared vulnerability to state violence. It was also an anti-colonial refusal of the policing afterlives of British colonialism and the indigenous elite’s continuation of these structures.

What is police violence? What is state violence? How did #EndSARS help us define both? #EndSARS revealed these to be within the same oppressive cycle of power where underpaid, exploited police officers redirect their own precarity onto Nigerian young people through extortion, harassment and too often, fatal encounters. As a result, Special Anti-Robbery Squad (SARS) officers targeted young people whose appearance and existence, locs, dyed hair, iPhones, being visibly queer, being a woman in ‘the wrong place’, were considered improper. #EndSARS showed how state violence operated: not just through individual bad actors weaponized by the state, but through an elite, exclusive structure that renders everyone unrepresented and oppressed.

Therefore, when young Nigerians organized to demand an end to SARS and bad governance, the state’s response was devastatingly predictable. On 20 October 2020, the state responded to peaceful protesters sitting on the floor and singing the then-national anthem with death. After the massacre at Lekki Toll Gate, surveillance of activists, frozen bank accounts, the Twitter ban, and coordinated online harassment followed over the next year. Feminist organizers faced accusations of feminized corruption, virtually backstabbed by former ‘allies’ who praised feminist leadership when it served their interests. Queer activists were told their visibility was unwanted and distracted the movement. Ethnic divisions that #EndSARS briefly united, reasserted themselves. The digital platform, Twitter, itself became caught in a global elite capture as Big Tech made explicit its empire aspirations.

Five years later, we remember #EndSARS not away from these fractures but through them. This memorial arrives at a moment where subsequent movements emerging out of #EndSARS have largely remained feminist-exclusionary. Twitter, now X under Elon Musk’s ownership, has lost much of the safety and moderation systems that made it a relatively safe commons that enabled #EndSARS. We continue to witness the silencing and public punishment of women political actors, from Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan’s removal from the Senate to the ongoing state and non-state harassment of feminist activists online.

Amid these devastating conditions, new generations of Nigerian feminists find solidarity and inspiration in what the Feminist Coalition represented. ‘FemCo’ has now become shorthand for a particular kind of Nigerian feminist organizing that is centred around digital labour and community management, extending this label far beyond the original fourteen women who formed the coalition. Young feminists invoke FemCo as proof that radical feminist organizing in Nigeria is possible, even as they navigate the personal costs and systemic barriers that make such organizing increasingly precarious.

Memory work is a radical feminist political project. We remember because #EndSARS is not in a vacuum but a contemporary addition to a series of movements emerging out of Nigeria, from the Egba Women’s Movement to the Aba Women’s War to the movement for the survival of Ogoni people and more. Every subsequent movement will build on this foundation and will choose to either learn from #EndSARS failures or inherit its tensions.

As a scholar who has spent the past five years researching #EndSARS’ digital networks of feminist/queer organizing and connections to histories of resistance, I recognize that we need to engage the afterlives of this movement in more reflexive ways. This interview with a member of the Feminist Coalition and organizer of the #ArewaMeToo and #NorthNormal movements, Fakhrriyyah Hashim, five years after the movement, is a lens into how those most central to organizing understand what was built, broken, and continues to persist.

We discuss the disconnect between the global celebration of #EndSARS as globally visible African digital organizing and the reality that police violence continues. We also examine the gendered backlash that has pushed many Nigerian women out of visible political organizing spaces, as well as what commitment those who organized #EndSARS feel toward younger feminists who have continued to emerge post-2020.

Our conversation continues below and has been edited for brevity.

OLOLADE FANIYI

Since 2020, #EndSARS and the Feminist Coalition have been subjects of study across academia, journalism and so on as an important model of African digital organizing. Yet, the tensions around policing and police violence in Nigeria continue. How do you navigate the disconnect between this global acknowledgement of this resistance, while the conditions you organized against remain largely unchanged?

FAKHRRIYYAH HASHIM

I agree there’s a paradox between the global acknowledgement of #EndSARS and the Feminist Coalition as a defining moment in digital organizing in Africa. Meanwhile, in Nigeria, the conditions of police brutality and state violence have stayed the same. But this recognition brought to focus the structures in which mobilization succeeded and not necessarily proscribing the needed change in protest outcomes.

Police brutality is a structural issue rooted in bad governance and a dated militarized policing culture, and global recognition does not weaken these structures, particularly in the absence of political will, as evidenced in the events of the 20th of October and what followed. Achieving the needed structural change will be instructed by the government’s willingness to assess and rid Nigeria’s security architecture of the vestiges of the military era and even colonialism.

So perhaps to navigate that tension is to accept that the movement’s impact isn’t erased because reforms didn’t happen overnight. It opened up a new political imagination for young Nigerians, as seen in the 2023 national elections, and it also showed what women-led collective action can achieve. Equally important is understanding that the struggle is longer and harder. As long as police brutality persists, #EndSARS remains poised to provoke calls for systemic change, however long it takes.

OLOLADE FANIYI

How do you think about the relationship between the specific violence of SARS and broader patterns of state violence in Nigeria, against women, against queer people, against poor people, and in the context of insecurity in the North?

FAKHRRIYYAH HASHIM

The violence of SARS wasn’t an aberration; it sits inside a wider ecosystem of state repression. Women face it through sexual violence and harassment by police, queer people through targeted raids and extortion, poor people through routine brutality, and people in the North through the double weight of insecurity and militarization. What #EndSARS exposed was not only police violence, but the government’s entire playbook for shutting down dissent: restrictive laws, disinformation campaigns, paid thugs, and the barricading of civic spaces.

This didn’t start in 2020; it built up over the years. By 2015, civil society was already recording sharp restrictions on freedoms and warning that these escalations would shrink the civic space. The warnings proved right because the same tactics were deployed against #EndSARS and have continued against subsequent protests.

So when you connect SARS to broader patterns of violence, you see the same logic at work, which shows an insecure state responding to demands for justice not with reform, but with repression. And that is what leaves many Nigerians, particularly the most vulnerable, caught between violence from state agents and the fear that collective action will only bring more of it.

OLOLADE FANIYI

In what ways has the #EndSARS experience shaped your thinking about police reform? What alternatives to carceral methods of policing do you imagine could work in Nigeria, given the security challenges Nigeria faces, where the state’s monopoly on violence is already contested by ‘non-state’ armed groups (terrorists, bandits, kidnappers, etc)?

FAKHRRIYYAH HASHIM

The #EndSARS protests made me even more convinced that police reform in Nigeria can’t just be about disciplining individuals or disbanding units; reform has to be structural. From my work in the peace and security sector, one glaring gap in local security is Nigeria’s lack of a constitutional state police, which undermines effective policing. With our centralized federal system, officers are constantly rotated into communities they don’t know, then transferred out again. They never build trust, build on local knowledge, or accountability that real policing depends on.

At the same time, in many conflict-affected parts of Nigeria, the state is barely present at all, which is why non-state armed groups thrive. So if we’re thinking of alternatives, I see community-based policing as essential, not vigilante justice we are accustomed to, but properly trained, locally rooted, and accountable security structures. Reform has to be about embedding security within communities, not just reinforcing a carceral system that people already perceive as hostile.

shop the republic

shop the republic

OLOLADE FANIYI

For a brief moment in 2020, #EndSARS created unprecedented unity across ethnic, religious and class lines in Nigeria. What made that integration possible, and why couldn’t it be sustained once the immediate moment passed?

FAKHRRIYYAH HASHIM

It’s important to be clear about the level of unity #EndSARS achieved. For a moment, young Nigerians across ethnic and religious lines came together around the common threat of police brutality. But this wasn’t absolute, particularly in parts of the North, where communities most affected by conflict resisted calls to disband SARS, fearing it would leave them even more vulnerable. Loyalty to the former administration and allegations of southern political sponsorship deepened those divides, and in some instances put protesters at risk from state-aligned actors and civilians. The divide was glaring during the northern-led EndBadGovernance protests of 2024.

What gave the movement its momentum was the emergence of a new young middle class, the tech community, who had become the prime targets of police extortion. Their resources and networks transformed what had been smaller, fragmented mobilizations into a nationally organized movement. Flutterwave’s fundraiser and the Feminist Coalition’s operational leadership in disbursing funds, providing legal aid, and supporting protesters created a model of efficiency and solidarity rarely seen in the civic space.

But the same visibility that gave #EndSARS its power also exposed its limits. The tech class, suddenly recognized as a political force, became vulnerable to state pressure, manifesting clearly in the crackdown on fintechs and crypto. Ultimately, it was the shooting of protesters at the Lekki Tollgate that made it impossible to sustain the #EndSARS movement. That moment was both traumatic and decisive. It showed the extent to which the state was willing to use lethal force against peaceful demonstrators, and it created an atmosphere of fear and mourning that shifted energy away from the streets.

The divide between regions, allegations of political sponsorship, and the movement’s reluctance to engage the government certainly created fractures, but these were secondary. The real breaking point was Lekki; it turned a moment of national mobilization into one of collective grief, after which sustaining unity at that scale was not possible.

OLOLADE FANIYI

The major platform on which #EndSARS circulated digitally has undergone massive changes since 2020, moving from Twitter to X. How does this affect how you think about platform-dependent organizing in Nigeria since then?

FAKHRRIYYAH HASHIM

I’ve been active on Twitter since 2009, back when it was mostly banter and jokes. But being in the wrong place at the wrong time during the Arab Spring shifted how I used the platform. From then on, it became a tool for advocacy around governance and security in Nigeria.

That’s why the changes since the sale have been so disruptive. The dismantling of safety and moderation systems has opened the floodgates; bile that had been moderated out is back, misinformation spreads unchecked, and bot networks poison discourse. Many prominent activists have left, and the sense of shared civic space feels diminished.

It’s a reminder that movements like #EndSARS achieved so much partly because the platform was functioning as a relatively safe commons. It’s riskier to organize and sustain advocacy without the safeguards that have been wrestled away. It is now imperative to diversify strategies that don’t leave movements vulnerable to the whims of one company or government, i.e. the 2021 Twitter ban by the government.

OLOLADE FANIYI

#EndSARS politicized many young Nigerians, and this political energy was channelled into movements like the ‘Obidient’ campaign and other advocacies for good governance. Do you see these electoral and civil society engagements as natural extensions of #EndSARS organizing, or do they represent a different kind of political project altogether?

FAKHRRIYYAH HASHIM

A large segment of the #EndSARS generation did, in fact, morph into the ‘Obidient movement’, and anyone who witnessed the 2023 elections could see that evolution. It was electric, it was charged, and it carried the same energy of defiance and hope. So in that sense, I see it as a natural extension of #EndSARS; young people translating street-level protest into electoral engagement.

Of course, the election results weren’t favourable, but the spark it ignited is indelible. What #EndSARS taught us, and what Obidients showed again, is that there are limits to what citizens can endure. If the same conditions as high cost of living, unemployment, state violence, and suppression of freedoms persist, the energy that fuelled these movements will resurface. The form may change, but the demand for accountability doesn’t go away.

shop the republic

shop the republic

OLOLADE FANIYI

Do you also think these new electoral and civil society movements retained the radical critique that a feminist lens offers, or was this lost in translation within these new political projects?

FAKHRRIYYAH HASHIM

I think #EndSARS was unique in how feminist it was. The Feminist Coalition didn’t just raise funds; it modelled accountability, transparency, care work, and intersectionality in political practice. That was a radical feminist critique in action.

By contrast, many of the new electoral and civil society movements, including the Obidients, carried the political energy forward but often left that feminist edge behind. Once activism shifted to electoral politics, it centred on personalities, parties, and the usual patriarchal structures. The feminist critique wasn’t entirely absent, but it wasn’t centred in the same way, so perhaps it lost force in translation. Feminist critique still exists, but one might say much of it remains in academia and smaller feminist circles rather than being the organizing logic of mass movements.

OLOLADE FANIYI

Five years later, how do you assess whether the backlash against feminist ‘leadership’ in #EndSARS has made it harder for women to take visible leadership roles in Nigerian political organizing?

FAKHRRIYYAH HASHIM

Movements can unify, but they also expose fault lines. With #EndSARS, women’s visibility in leadership disrupted spaces typically dominated by men, even though the protests weren’t explicitly centred on gender. When the movement’s demands weren’t immediately met, blame quickly took on a gendered form, reflecting wider societal norms that already cast women’s leadership as suspicious. Women were singled out more harshly than men, accused of mismanagement, and subjected to online abuse.

Over time, this targeted harassment, referred to as online gender-based violence, has pushed many women out of political organizing spaces that already marginalize women’s issues, resulting in fewer women being visible at the front of political organizing.

shop the republic

shop the republic

OLOLADE FANIYI

There’s now a generation of Nigerian feminists who see FemCo as proof that radical feminist organizing in Nigeria is possible. What commitment, if any, do you feel toward these younger activists, and given what you’ve experienced, what would you tell them about navigating the tensions between feminist responsibility, safety and the personal costs that feminist movements require?

FAKHRRIYYAH HASHIM

I understand why younger feminists see FemCo’s work during the protests as proof of what women can achieve as a collective outside of gender issues and still deliver on impact. Each generation is faced with its own unique challenges, and this is but one chapter in ours. It is important that younger women feel emboldened to claim spaces wider than what we have, just as we have done to further the feminist ideals of those before us.

To be candid, there are personal costs. The backlash has real-world consequences. I’ve watched gendered harassment force women back into their shells, and it is tragic. The toll on mental health is real, and safety concerns, physical, mental and digital, shape even the most basic decisions, more so as digital safety suffers, something I wish I had prioritized. Feminist responsibility advocates care for ourselves and each other, because burnout and empathy fatigue only serve those who want to retain the status quo.

The feminist struggle is a lifelong pursuit to improve conditions for women, and you can only give as much as you’re able. So, it’s important to look out for yourself, your safety and build solidarity across the aisle with those whose values align, and take a step back when you need to. Responsibility is also about ensuring the sustainability of the feminist pursuit, without forgetting yourself⎈

BUY THE MAGAZINE AND/OR THE COVER