A Feminist Pan-Africanism for a World in Flux

Feminist

Illustration by Shalom Ojo / THE REPUBLIC.

THE MINISTRY OF gender x sexuality

A Feminist Pan-Africanism for a World in Flux

As the impacts of recent events in global politics continue to reverberate, business as usual for Africa is impossible. A radical new vision is needed and possible. Feminist pan-Africanism is not just an internal reform of pan-African ideals; it is a necessary reorientation of Africa’s role in the world, one that centres justice, accountability, and people’s power as the foundation for genuine sovereignty.
Feminist

Illustration by Shalom Ojo / THE REPUBLIC.

THE MINISTRY OF gender x sexuality

A Feminist Pan-Africanism for a World in Flux

As the impacts of recent events in global politics continue to reverberate, business as usual for Africa is impossible. A radical new vision is needed and possible. Feminist pan-Africanism is not just an internal reform of pan-African ideals; it is a necessary reorientation of Africa’s role in the world, one that centres justice, accountability, and people’s power as the foundation for genuine sovereignty.

The world is in flux, with events quickly eclipsing the ability to respond. As former allies in the global North no longer see eye to eye on the direction of global politics, new actors in international relations turn their attention to the African continent. It is in this context that China has become Africa’s largest trading partner, Africa’s once enduring relationship with the European Union is at an impasse and Russia’s deepening engagement champions militarism regardless of its consequences. Meanwhile India, Turkey and countries in the Gulf seek to expand their influence in a multipolar world where Africa is increasingly seen as a battleground for global competition.

This is why Africans need to chart their own path. Pan-Africanism offers one option and has always been more than a call for African unity; it is a political project rooted in liberation, self-determination, and the transformation of global power relations. Born from anti-colonial resistance and diasporic solidarity, pan-Africanism envisions a world where African peoples—both on the continent and across the diaspora—can overcome the legacies of slavery, imperialism and racial capitalism to shape their own futures. It is a philosophy developed to directly challenge the status quo of the international order that rendered Africa peripheral and its people expendable. At its heart, pan-Africanism has always been about agency: not just freedom from domination, but the power to set terms, define values, and lead globally on questions of justice, sovereignty and solidarity. In today’s contentious, multipolar world, pan-Africanism is more relevant than ever. Yet, it too must evolve lest it reproduces the same hierarchies it seeks to challenge. In particular, pan-Africanism continues to replicate the same patriarchy of international relations—even with global frameworks intended to prevent this.

MULTIPOLARITY AND AFRICA’S AGENCY: WHO REALLY BENEFITS?

In today’s fragmented world, multipolarity can work to the advantage of African countries. As multiple powers jostle for continued relevance in global politics, African countries are well positioned to leverage their agency, collectively. Already, African governments are already playing actors against each other to get better terms. But largely, it is Africa still playing a game determined by others.

There is a question about whether new players simply reinforce the same old extractive relationships. Whereas the African Union’s Agenda 2063 envisions a continent that is self-reliant, united and economically independent. However, the reality on the ground suggests that most African economies remain heavily dependent on foreign trade, debt and investment. Let us take Africa-Chinese relations for example. China’s Belt and Road Initiative has financed massive infrastructure projects, but many African countries are now struggling with unsustainable debt. Meanwhile, the West pursues exploitative trade relationships that are underpinned by coloniality. At the same time, intra-African trade, which should be a cornerstone of regional economic strength, remains underdeveloped due to global structural barriers. With most African states burdened by debts held by international financial institutions like the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank, whose shareholders are the wealthiest countries. This makes participation in any trading difficult. High debt servicing obligations, for example, contributed to currency devaluation in Nigeria in 2016 and 2023. This level of currency instability makes it expensive for Nigerian firms to import machinery or inputs from neighbouring African countries like Côte d’Ivoire or Ghana, hurting prospects for regional agro-processing and manufacturing trade.

Beyond the economic dimension, the promise of democracy and justice for Africans, especially post-independence and following the Cold War, is eroding. The continent is beset by war and violence, from the Horn of Africa to the Sahel, where default responses to conflict have been increased militarism, partly in response to the return of geopolitics. Militarism is also evident in the recent spate of military coups on the continent. In the last few years, no fewer than nine African countries, including Mali, Guinea, Sudan, Chad, Burkina Faso, Niger and Gabon, have experienced coups or military takeovers. ​As feminists have noted, militarism entrenches patriarchy by normalizing violence and exploiting women’s bodies and labour. Indeed, adding to the many decades of Western militarism in Africa, recent military engagements in Africa by Russia, including those involving private military companies who promise security assistance, have only compromised security stability.

The economic and political challenges facing Africa—from the continued exploitation and trade imbalances to governance crises and regional instability—demand a renewed commitment to pan-Africanism. This is even more urgent especially as many wealthy countries are cutting their aid budget usually bound for Africa. In February 2025, the Dutch minister for foreign trade and development, Reinette Klever, announced cuts to international aid, while the United Kingdom followed soon after, cutting its aid budget from 0.5 per cent to 0.3 per cent of its gross national income. The current moment calls for unity, collective self-reliance, and shared political will on the continent. To overcome external domination and internal fragmentation, pan-Africanism remains not just an ideological aspiration but a necessary framework for economic liberation, political sovereignty, and a dignified future for all Africans.

BEYOND TRADITIONAL PAN-AFRICANISM: WHY A FEMINIST APPROACH MATTERS

Pan-Africanism has historically carried the promise of collective liberation and envisions a united front capable of resisting external control and asserting Africa’s place in the world on its own terms. It is the philosophy behind many of the continental wide initiatives that have developed in the post-independence era. First came the Organization for African Unity (OAU). Established in 1963, the OAU was intended to institutionalize pan-Africanism, and in particular, self-determination. For over 30 years, the OAU played a crucial role in supporting independence struggles across the continent and opposing apartheid in South Africa.

Despite its commitment to anti-colonialism and continental integration, the OAU struggled to overcome internal divisions, particularly around sovereignty and non-interference, significantly limiting its effectiveness. Rather, the OAU shielded authoritarian regimes at the expense of Africans. Ultimately, the organization’s inability to meaningfully promote political and economic unity, resolve conflicts, or prevent human rights abuses demonstrated the gap between its pan-African ideals and institutional realities.

It is the failures of the OAU that led to the establishment of the African Union (AU) as a new and improved attempt to institutionalize pan-Africanism once more for the greater good. Established in 2001, the AU envisions a more progressive pan-Africanism. It explicitly promotes principles such as democratic governance, human rights, gender equality and collective intervention to prevent conflicts and human rights abuses. The AU has established instruments that demonstrate greater emphasis on gender equality and women’s empowerment. These include the Maputo Protocol in 2003 and more recently, the African Union Convention on Ending Violence against Women and Girls in 2024.

Both the OAU and its successor, the AU, however, have historically prioritized patriarchal interpretations of pan-Africanism, often marginalizing women’s voices, experiences and leadership in favour of male-dominated political narratives and power structures. Despite rhetorical commitments to gender equality, patriarchal practices have persisted within their institutions, evident in the limited representation of women in decision-making roles and a reluctance to systematically address gender-based violence and inequality in conflict and peacebuilding contexts. Consequently, pan-Africanism, as institutionalized by both organizations, has reproduced the same patriarchal norms that govern unequal global politics, this time, within the continent. Invariably, this undermines the transformative of pan-Africanism, which feminist activists and scholars have called out.

Feminists challenge this dominant ‘story’ of pan-Africanism and its praxis for excluding gender minorities, especially women and their experiences for a pan-Africanist future. This is despite the fact that early pan-Africanists like Thomas Sankara famously asserted that ‘there is no true social revolution without the liberation of women.’ In actively supporting women’s participation in political, economic and social life in Burkina Faso, and the continent, Sankara centred feminism within pan-Africanism, wherein patriarchal oppression must be rejected.

As contemporary African feminists like Sylvia Tamale and Amina Mama have shown, a pan-Africanism that is feminist is the only route to true agency, not a matter of choosing between global powers. This approach revitalizes pan-Africanism by insisting that unity and sovereignty cannot be built on patriarchal, elite-driven foundations. It centres the voices, labour and leadership of those long excluded from state-centric and masculinist approaches to African unity. Post-independence state-building often concentrated power in male-dominated institutions, sidelining women’s movements and obscuring the labour and knowledge production of feminist organizers across the continent. For instance, across the continent, very few women have held positions of power as presidents or prime ministers, or have held top positions in defence, foreign policy or the economy.

Feminist pan-Africanism insists on reclaiming the full legacy of pan-Africanism. In this vision, the pan-Africanist project not only confronts racial and imperial domination but also gendered and class-based inequalities that weaken Africa’s collective strength. Without feminist inclusion, pan-Africanism is weak in its credibility and its strategic reach becomes limited. It is important to note, however, that what feminist pan-Africanism offers is not an add-on to the existing vision, but a redefinition of its foundations. It calls for an expanded understanding of solidarity—one that includes struggles over domestic labour, land rights, bodily autonomy, and care work as central to African sovereignty. It sees unity not as consensus among elites, but as shared struggle against the intersecting systems of patriarchy, capitalism, militarism and neocolonialism. In doing so, it strengthens the original promise of pan-Africanism by rooting it in the everyday lives and demands of African people, especially those at the margins of formal politics.

With this understanding, a feminist pan-Africanism offers a sharper lens for analysing and understanding global politics that is contentious and ostensibly multipolar. It exposes how the global economy depends on undervalued African labour—especially women’s labour—while extracting resources and displacing communities. It challenges securitized approaches to governance that rely on militarization that includes foreign militaries. It demands development alternatives that prioritize ecological balance, and economic redistribution over extractive growth and reparations for past and current harms. This approach is necessary because ecological collapse reinforces poverty and conflict, and women especially bear the brunt of ongoing extraction. Confronting these challenges unequivocally is essential to liberation.

In this volatile global moment—marked by climate crisis, geopolitical rivalries, authoritarian resurgence and deepening inequality—Africa needs a bold and inclusive political strategy. Feminist pan-Africanism is not just an internal reform of pan-African ideals; it is a necessary reorientation of Africa’s role in the world, one that centres justice, accountability and people’s power as the foundation for genuine sovereignty.

shop the republic

shop the republic

A FEMINIST STRATEGY FOR ECONOMIC SOVEREIGNTY

Economic independence has long been a central goal of pan-Africanism, but mainstream strategies have given way to neoliberalism. Broadly, neoliberalism is a political and economic ideology that promotes free markets, deregulation, privatization, and the limitation of state intervention in the economy and society at large, even as it maintains social security net for the most vulnerable. Ushered in by post-independence economic crises—resulting from an unequal global political economy, such as escalating debts to international financial institutions—African elites accepted neoliberalism, often under duress, as the only way to economic development. This was indeed the basis of the World Bank and the IMF imposed Structural Adjustment Programmes. As state capacity has eroded, the belief in privatization, deregulation and reduced government spending on social services, as well as the liberalization of trade and investment, has further pushed several African countries towards an approach that has promised greater integration into the benefits of global capitalism, however limited they may be.

The institutionalization of pan-Africanism has also assumed this approach with the establishment of the New Partnership for Africa’s Development in 2001, which has emphasized market-oriented reforms and private sector investment rather than the original ideals of collective economic autonomy and socialist transformation. This shift is reflective of global trends that has made neoliberal capitalism the dominant in international economic governance.

However, this approach to the economy is exclusionary and departs from what should be a radical pan-African vision of economic justice. Rather, Africa remains overtly dependent on the whims of countries of the global North, which were former colonial powers. The current trend of global North governments significantly cutting aid underscores the harm of neoliberalism. These cuts will exacerbate already existing structural inequalities, which had been established through decades of neoliberal policies. The resulting economic pressures will deepen poverty, social exclusion and gendered vulnerabilities in the global South.

Across Africa, millions of women sustain their communities. Yet, they are rarely recognized in economic policymaking, even when neoliberal solutions, presented as commonsensical, harm them. For example, Private Public Partnerships (PPP) are pushed as a way of leveraging private sector expertise and capital to fill funding gaps. Yet, as evidence has shown, when it comes to education and infrastructure, this approach to economic governance often prioritizes profit over access, shifting the risk to the public while private actors benefit. Invariably, this approach deepens inequality. One need not look further than the Lekki Toll Road Concession PPP in Lagos, Nigeria, which promised economic growth, job opportunities and ease of access. Now, its biggest legacy is exclusionary access and displacement of many who relied on the space for their income. Today, Africa’s economic future depends on rejecting these neoliberal models and building economies that prioritize social well-being over GDP growth alone. Feminist pan-Africanism offers a different alternative—one that centres care economies and that is closer to the ambitions of early pan-Africanists.

A feminist pan-Africanist economic agenda would prioritize the recognition of women’s labour in market trading, farming, and social care as essential to economic stability. Importantly, in African interventions toward greater continental integration, such as the African Continental Free Trade Area, it is essential to include women and other gender minorities. Additionally, this approach to the economy would reject debt dependency calling for fairer trade and reparations for colonial exploitation. Importantly, this approach would prioritize climate justice. Rather than relying on foreign loans and deals that enrich elites while burdening ordinary people, feminist pan-Africanism insists on economic policies that work for Africa’s most marginalized—not just its political and business class.

DISAVOWING MILITARISM

Ending the reliance on militarism as an answer to insecurity or governance challenges is an essential precondition to achieving the ambitions of pan-Africanism. Feminists have tended to critique militarism. Central to this critique is the recognition that militarism, whether enacted by state institutions or non-state actors, consistently reinforces gendered hierarchies, positioning violence and coercion as primary means of governance and conflict resolution. Such militarized frameworks disproportionately harm African gender minorities including women and girls, who bear the brunt of war’s physical, psychological, economic and social consequences.

Historically, militarism has entrenched patriarchal and neocolonial power dynamics across the continent; it is thus unsurprising that the marginalization of feminist perspectives results in cycles of violence that entrench systems of oppression and exclusion.

A feminist pan-Africanism fundamentally rejects investments in militarization, calling for the radical restructuring of state priorities, moving away from inflated defence budgets and arms proliferation. This paradigm shift challenges the dominant geopolitical narratives of multipolarity, which often equate national security with military capability, competitive arms accumulation, and aggressive diplomacy. Feminist pan-Africanism urges a reframing of security that centres on the lived experiences of communities, recognizing everyday peace, community-based conflict resolution and gender-sensitive reconciliation processes as foundations for stability and genuine peace. Disavowing militarism also necessitates a critical interrogation of Africa’s relationships with international partners, resisting exploitative security alliances and arms trading that reproduce colonial dependencies and compromise continental autonomy.

Moreover, feminist pan-Africanism emphasizes regional solidarity and collective action across national borders, fostering collaboration among feminist movements, civil society actors and policymakers committed to peace and social justice. This requires holding the AU accountable to gender-responsive peacebuilding principles, insisting that women’s meaningful participation, feminist diplomacy, and transformative justice form core pillars of continental governance frameworks.

By committing to demilitarization, feminist pan-Africanism actively disrupts and dismantles violent, patriarchal, and colonial legacies, envisioning and constructing new political imaginaries where solidarity, equity and human dignity guide Africa’s engagement in multipolar global affairs. Such an approach not only fortifies Africa’s position globally but ensures that the continent’s contributions to international politics reflect a transformative feminist vision rooted in lasting peace, justice and liberation.

 If Africa is to truly exercise agency in global security matters, it must move beyond being a battleground for foreign military interests and instead define security on its own terms.

shop the republic

shop the republic

TOWARDS A FEMINIST FUTURE

For most African countries and institutions, diplomacy relies on patriarchal, elitist norms—closed-door negotiations, backroom deals and alliances driven by state interests rather than popular needs.

Feminist pan-Africanism calls for a different kind of diplomacy—one that is participatory, accountable and rooted in justice. Already, the possibilities of a different kind of diplomatic practice were demonstrated by the emergence of feminist foreign policies. Yet, the rollback of this approach to international relations is telling. For African feminists, building alliances with other global South movements is essential to rethinking global politics. In championing South-South cooperation, a feminist approach to pan-Africanism envisions the role of African states as extending beyond engagement with global powers to supporting international relations fundamentally aimed at liberation.

shop the republic

shop the republic

If Africa wants true agency in this multipolar world, it is time to stop playing by the old rules. A feminist pan-Africanist approach is not just about gender—it is about rethinking power, economy, security and diplomacy in ways that serve Africa’s people, not just its elites.

This is not a utopian vision. Across the continent, feminist movements, youth activists, and community organizers are already leading the way. The challenge is whether African governments, institutions, and regional bodies like the AU will embrace this vision—or continue to be pulled in different directions by external powers. The future of Africa must be shaped by those who have always been at the forefront of its struggles—its people, its movements and its feminists

BUY THE MAGAZINE AND/OR THE COVER